每場雅思考試之后，新航道上海學校雅思頻道小編會分享每次雅思考試大作文范文及解析，希望對各位備考考生們有所幫助，對雅思寫作有所提高!本文是4月27日雅思大作文范文及解析：應該保存哪些老建筑?利弊是什么?

  Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than the other ones. Which types of old buildings should be preserved? Do you think that the advantages of preserving these old buildings outweigh the disadvantages？

  范文及解析：

  解析&審題

  本題的關鍵詞是老建筑。這個話題在2017年12月4日出現過，問的是“為什么需要保護老建筑”。此外，2018年2月3日的考試也與本話題相關，問的是“應該保護老建筑還是應該建新房子和道路?”本次考試要求討論的題目是“哪些老建筑需要保護以及保護老建筑的優劣勢”。可見，這幾次考試題目既有交叉之處，又各有側重。

  按照常規想法，我們一般會認為那些具有歷史文化價值的老建筑應該保留下來，這既是我們歷史文化的一部分，也可以作為旅游資源加以使用。但是有些老建筑可能已經對城市安全產生了影響，那就應該拆除重建。因此，原則上我們應該保留那些具有歷史價值的老建筑，但也要根據具體情況決定是否應該保留它們。

  以下是唐老師的高分范文，大家可認真閱讀，看老師是如何把以上思路落實到具體文字表達的。

  老師筆記

  01

  It is important to maintain certain old buildings in view of their advantages to societies. Old buildings such as museums, palaces, religious constructions, and ancient structures and sites are a part of a nation’s history. Societies have long sought to protect and preserve these cultural heritage for considerations ranging from historical research to public education to tourist attractions and to the desire to reinforce a sense of national identity. People have only to cast their eyes on an old building to feel the presence of the past and the spirit of a place, as if it were the very reflection of history. In this respect, demolishing an old building of historic value is no different from destroying a piece of history.

  鑒于某些舊建筑對社會的好處，對它們進行維護是很重要的。博物館、宮殿、宗教建筑、古建筑和遺址等老建筑是一個國家歷史的一部分。長期以來，社會一直在尋求保護和保存這些文化遺產，原因從歷史研究到公共教育，再到旅游景點，再到增強民族認同感的愿望，不一而足。人們只需把目光投向一座古老的建筑，就可以感受到過去的存在和一個地方的精神，就好像它是歷史的鏡像。在這方面，拆除具有歷史價值的舊建筑與摧毀一段歷史并無不同。

  解析

  (1) 本段開門見山，回答題目中的第一個問題，提出那些對社會有好處的老建筑應該保存。隨后列舉這類老建筑，然后列舉原因。

  (2) In view of 鑒于;因為

  (3) Cultural heritage 文化遺產

  (4) Range from ... to... 從......到......的范圍內

  (5) Reinforce 強化;加強

  (6) National identity 國家身份

  (7) Demolish 拆除;推倒

  02

  Nevertheless, sometimes it is better to knock down certain types of old buildings that are less worth preserving. Although this might seem “morally” wrong, actually it is the right choice to do so. When a historic structure has become a threat to society, for example, having it removed can actually add more value to the area around it. In such cases, of course, the land cleared should be used beneficially for the progress of society. This change could attract property investors to that area that might have otherwise been avoided. Furthermore, it would often cost a lot more to restore a destroyed old building than to replace it with a new one.

  然而，有時拆除某些不太值得保留的舊建筑會更好。雖然這看起來“道德上”是錯誤的，但實際上是正確的選擇。例如，當一個歷史建筑對社會構成威脅時，移除它實際上可以為它周圍的地區增加更多的價值。當然，在這種情況下，被清理的土地應該被用來使之有利于社會進步。這一變化可能會吸引房地產投資者進入他們本來會避免的領域。此外，修復一座被摧毀的舊建筑通常要比用一座新建筑替換它花費更多。

  解析

  (1) 本段轉換角度，討論保存老建筑的弊端：對社會構成安全問題;阻止地方增值;花費巨大。

  (2) Knock down 拆除

  (3) Add value to... 為......增加價值

  (4) Replace ... with... 用......來代替......

  03

  In the big picture of pros and cons, it should be made a legal rule to protect and preserve old buildings of historic value. But then, there should as well be a few exceptions to the rule.

  在正反兩面的局面中，應該制定法律規則來保護和保存具有歷史價值的老建筑。但是，也應該允許規則之外存在一些例外。

  解析

  (1) 本段為結論，并重申自己的觀點。

  (2) Pros and cons 贊同和反對

  (3) A few exceptions to the rule 規則的幾個例外

  高分范文

  It is important to maintain certain old buildings in view of their advantages to societies. Old buildings such as museums, palaces, religious constructions, and ancient structures and sites are a part of a nation’s history. Societies have long sought to protect and preserve these cultural heritage for considerations ranging from historical research to public education to tourist attractions and to the desire to reinforce a sense of national identity. People have only to cast their eyes on an old building to feel the presence of the past and the spirit of a place, as if it were the very reflection of history. In this respect, demolishing an old building of historic value is no different from destroying a piece of history.

  Nevertheless, sometimes it is better to knock down certain types of old buildings that are less worth preserving. Although this might seem “morally” wrong, actually it is the right choice to do so. When a historic structure has become a threat to society, for example, having it removed can actually add more value to the area around it. In such cases, of course, the land cleared should be used beneficially for the progress of society. This change could attract property investors to that area that might have otherwise been avoided. Furthermore, it would often cost a lot more to restore a destroyed old building than to replace it with a new one.

  In the big picture of pros and cons, it should be made a legal rule to protect and preserve old buildings of historic value. But then, there should as well be a few exceptions to the rule.

  建議背誦的句子

  1. Societies have long sought to protect and preserve these cultural heritage for considerations ranging from historical research to public education to tourist attractions and to the desire to reinforce a sense of national identity.

  長期以來，社會一直在尋求保護和保存這些文化遺產，原因從歷史研究到公共教育，再到旅游景點，再到增強民族認同感的愿望，不一而足。

  2. In this respect, demolishing an old building of historic value is no different from destroying a piece of history.

  在這方面，拆除具有歷史價值的舊建筑與摧毀一段歷史并無不同。

  2. When a historic structure has become a threat to society, for example, having it removed can actually add more value to the area around it.

  例如，當一個歷史建筑對社會構成威脅時，移除它實際上可以為它周圍的地區增加更多的價值。

  4. Furthermore, it would often cost a lot more to restore a destroyed old building than to replace it with a new one.

  此外，修復一座被摧毀的舊建筑通常要比用一座新建筑替換它花費更多。

  以上就是2019年4月27日雅思考試大作文范文及解析，想要了解更多雅思資訊，請關注雅思頻道 。