上海新航道托福培訓小編特別整理了首場考試的詳情，這次給大家帶來了寫的關于2021年1月9日托福獨立寫作范文及解析。希望幫助考生對照文本更好的研究真題，充分備考，爭取理想成績，實現留學夢想。

  2021年1月9日托福獨立寫作題目

  Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

  Government should not provide financial support to artists (For example, painters, writer, musicians …), and the government should let them support themselves.

  范文解析

  A vast majority of people advocate that the artists should be subsidized by the government because they celebrate the individual artists as both creator of beauty and catalyst for the community development. However, in my opinion, fiscal support for the artists may be counterproductive in many aspects and government had better not provide this support.

  Subsidize vt. 資助

  Subsidy n. 補貼

  Catalyst for sth. 某事的刺激因素

  Firstly, government funding of artists is inequitable for the taxpayers. To specify, now that artistic creations are not basic necessity of life, it is unfair that every taxpayer, the major benefactor of such funding, need to contribute towards such creations that they seldom engage with. Admittedly, every individual enjoys some forms of art, be it through movies, music or books. However, such forms of art are highly lucrative. With considerable revenue gained from the tickets fees and relevant industries, filmmakers, actors, singers and composers are more than capable to support themselves, and the government funding for them is thus undoubtedly redundant. In this case, if those artists are still subsidized by the government, complaints from the masses may be the necessary result. As for the artists whose creations are highbrow or caviar to the general, the rich or the art aficionado should fund them out of their own pocket instead of seeking funding from the government.

  盡管電影等藝術形式是民眾平常都能接觸到的，但這都是高利潤產業，其從業者無需被資助;而那些陽春白雪的藝術作品應該有真正喜愛它的人而不是被政府資助

  Furthermore, while the artists are expected to be motivated by the financial support, they are more likely to become excessively reliant on it, which is certainly undesirable. In other words, when they are aware that no matter whether their works can sell well, their livelihood is still ensured by the government’s subsidy, hardly can they be forceful enough honing their creations. In this case, how can we expect any more masterpieces? On the contrary, without the government funding, artists may be more meticulous in creating, most likely because they would otherwise find it hard to earn their bread from those creations. Hence, for the advent of elaborate pieces of art, the artists should not be funded by the government.

  Earn one’s bread 謀取生計

  Hone vt. 磨練，雕琢

  Meticulous adj. 細心的

  To sum up, considering the potential complaints from the taxpayers and negative effects brought by the over reliance, artists are better to support themselves than to be subsidized by the government.

  總結段，概括分論點，重新點明立場即可